Are you facing Obama’s dilemma: Professor vs. Preacher?
By Bruce Hale on August 29, 2011Now, I’m not a particularly political guy. I’m more interested in how people communicate than in the daily sturm und drang of the Washington scene. But one thing I have noticed: Our president’s communication style has changed.
And it’s not helping him.
Compare Obama in earlier campaign mode with Obama in current governing mode. Yes, he’s still articulate and intelligent, still a good communicator. But he’s gone from preacher to professor, losing some effectiveness in the process.
As preacher on the campaign trail, he spoke to hearts and minds. He told powerful stories — witness the 2004 Democratic National Convention, when his own personal story was the subject…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fMNIofUw2I
…or his 2008 acceptance speech, where he told the moving tale of 106-year-old Ann Nixon Cooper, a woman born just a generation past slavery, who was finally able to vote for a mixed race president.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Mb1Xg48tyE&feature=fvsr
Powerful stuff. He went for the emotions, and he connected with voters, galvanizing the nation. That’s the preacher.
But the Obama we’ve seen lately has been mired in governance — professorial territory. He’s trotting out facts and figures, telling us what we should do. And though we know it’s important stuff, our eyes glaze over, our interest sags.
In short, we’re not convinced. Need evidence? Witness his recent address on raising the debt ceiling:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyG0kFCx-qE
Now, granted, governance isn’t as sexy as campaigning on ideas. The issues of governance are complicated, nuanced, and tricky as hell to communicate. But do the presentations need to be so dull along with it? Dullness doesn’t win hearts and minds, and that’s why Obama’s current speeches need more preacher and less professor.
Anytime you’re appealing to someone, trying to persuade and get them to make a decision, you’re sunk unless you can reach their emotions. Do you still need logic? Of course. Both sides of the brain — left and right — must be satisfied before we feel comfortable deciding. That means we need logic and statistics, along with stories and metaphors.
But here’s the kicker. Despite its phenomenal evolution, the human brain is still wired to respond more to the emotional than the cognitive. That means we make most of our decisions based on feelings rather than facts — as one glance at the stock market will tell you. What does this mean?
Ultimately, stories rule.
So if I were a president trying to govern a polarized nation, I’d draw more on the preacher and less on the professor. Can you really weave stories and metaphors from such uninspiring material as debt ceilings?
Of course you can. But that’s a story for another time.




